Global Equity

4 stars based on 36 reviews

The employee is taxed tax treatment of stock options in australia restricted stock upon grant and on RSUs upon vesting may include personal assets tax. Tax withholding and reporting are required upon grant for restricted stock and upon vesting of RSUs.

Argentine subsidiaries are allowed to deduct the amount reimbursed to the parent company for the cost of the benefits if a Reimbursement or Recharge Agreement is in place. Obtaining an employee's written consent for the processing and transfer of his or her personal data is the most common approach to comply with certain aspects of data protection requirements. The employer also is required to register any database that includes an employee's personal data with the Argentine privacy authorities.

Benefits received from restricted stock or RSUs may be considered part of the employment relationship and included in a severance payment if the awards are repeatedly granted to an employee.

Upon involuntary termination of employment, an employee may be entitled to continued vesting and other rights with respect to his or her award. In order to reduce the risk of employee claims, the tax treatment of stock options in australia agreement signed by an employee should provide, among other things, that vesting of restricted stock or RSUs ceases upon termination of employment, and that the plan and any awards under it are discretionary.

Although plan materials are not required to be translated into Spanish, it is recommended, to ensure that employees understand the terms of their awards. Tax treatment of stock options in australia materials should be addressed to individual employees in order to avoid securities law requirements.

The employee is taxed on the spread upon exercise including personal assets tax, if applicable. Social insurance contributions are generally payable by the employee and employer when an option is exercised. The employer is also required to register any database that includes an employee's personal data with the Argentine privacy authorities.

Benefits received from an option may be considered part of the employment relationship and included in a severance payment if options are repeatedly granted to an employee. Upon involuntary termination of employment, an employee may be entitled to continued vesting and other rights with respect to his or her option.

In order to reduce the risk of employee claims, the award agreement signed by an employee should provide, among other things, that vesting of an option ceases upon termination of employment, and that the plan tax treatment of stock options in australia any awards under it are discretionary. Social insurance contributions are generally payable by the employee and employer when the shares are purchased. Benefits received from a purchase right may be considered part of the employment relationship and included in a severance payment if purchase rights are repeatedly granted to an employee.

Upon involuntary termination of employment, an employee may be entitled to continued participation in the plan. In order to reduce the risk of employee claims, the offer document signed by an employee should provide, among other things, that participation in the plan ceases upon termination of employment, and that the plan and any awards under tax treatment of stock options in australia are discretionary. In light of restrictions on payroll deductions, alternative arrangements may be necessary for contributions to the plan.

For options granted after July 1,generally an employee is subject to income tax on the spread upon exercise of the options. Employees will be able to defer the tax provided certain conditions are met. Options are generally subject to tax at grant tax treatment of stock options in australia subject to real risk of forfeiture egvesting conditions. Where the shares issued on exercise of such options are subject to genuine disposal restrictions, income tax will be further deferred until those restrictions cease.

Income tax can be deferred for up to 15 years from the grant of the options. Where an option is granted with no real risk of forfeiture or does not meet specific conditions, an employee will be subject to income tax at grant.

Also, beneficial tax treatment will be available for "start-up" companies meeting certain requirements. Where options are granted to eligible employees, for "start-up treatment" to apply, certain conditions for tax deferral must be met. In those circumstances, the employee will only pay tax on the capital gain on the sale of the share issued on exercise. Tax withholding is not required unless the employee does not provide his or her tax file number to the employer.

The employer is required to report income received by an employee from an option to both the employee and to the Australian tax authority, and the employee is required to report such income on his or her annual tax return. Option benefits received by employees in some Australian states may be included in the determination of employer payroll tax.

Reimbursement made to the parent company for the cost of the option benefits egthe spreadpursuant to a written agreement, should enable the subsidiary to deduct such cost from its taxable income.

Generally, the employee is taxed on the spread difference between exercise price at discount and market values upon exercise. Gains from the sale of shares acquired before January 1, Gains from the sale of shares acquired on or after January 1, are subject to tax irrespective of the holding period.

Reimbursement of the parent company tax treatment of stock options in australia the cost of the benefit egthe spread pursuant to a written reimbursement agreement should enable the subsidiary to deduct such cost from its income taxes.

A preferential tax treatment for the benefits out of the granting itself is possible if certain circumstances are met. The employee will be taxed upon the grant of the stock options, if he accepts the stock options in writing within 60 calendar days following the tax treatment of stock options in australia of the offer. The taxable amount is a lump sum computed on the basis of a formula provided by law. If the stock tax treatment of stock options in australia that are not accepted within 60 days from the date of offer, the employee will be taxed on the gain upon exercise.

Generally, withholding requirements apply if the subsidiary is involved with the delivery of the award or underlying shares or if it is involved in the administration of the plan. Reimbursement by the subsidiary of the costs of the benefits may qualify as sufficient involvement.

Reporting is required for options accepted within 60 days of the offer date. For options accepted after 60 days of offer, reporting is required if withholding obligations are triggered. In situations where the subsidiary reimburses the parent company for the cost of the option benefits, a deduction is generally allowed, although there is recent case law where the reimbursement has been considered as a non-deductible capital loss on shares.

A written reimbursement agreement is recommended. Reimbursement may result in income tax and social insurance withholding. The taxation tax treatment of stock options in australia stock options in Brazil is subject to controversy since some practitioners take the position that any gain realized should be subject to capital gains tax because of the uncertainty of the triggering event, whereas others sustain that it should be taxed as ordinary income as part of an employee's compensation plan.

Therefore, employers and employees are encouraged to consult with their own tax advisors regularly to determine the consequences of taking or not taking any action concerning stock options. Usually, the grant of stock options does not give rise to a taxable event in Brazil.

However, tax authorities may have a different view and charge individual income tax and social insurance contributions upon grant, particularly if clearly treated as compensation by the issuer. Depending on the position adopted, employees may be subject to ordinary income type of taxation upon exercise of options. If employees sell any shares acquired upon exercise of options, gains will be subject to capital gains tax.

Employees may be exempt from capital gains tax if the gross proceeds from the sale of any stock during a particular calendar month are below a designated threshold. If the threshold is exceeded for the relevant month, the entire gain is subject to tax ienot just the amount exceeding such threshold.

Tax withholding and reporting by the employer will be required if it is treated as compensation and treated as employment ordinary income. Capital gains tax calculation and reporting would be the employee's responsibility. If options are offered to all employees in Brazil, and the subsidiary reimburses the parent company for the cost of option benefits, tax treatment of stock options in australia subsidiary should be able to deduct such cost from its income taxes, provided that it is treated as compensation which could cause options to be deemed employment income subject to social insurance contributions.

The employee is taxed on the spread upon exercise. Even if the subsidiary reimburses the parent company for the cost of the option benefits egthe spread pursuant to a written reimbursement agreement, it is unable to deduct such cost from its income taxes. The employee generally is taxed on the spread upon exercise.

Any tax treatment of stock options in australia upon the sale of shares is also subject to tax. The benefit obtained from the exercise of the option when the worker makes the payment is a higher remuneration that accrues at the time of the exercise of the option. If the subsidiary deducts the cost of the option benefits, withholding and reporting are required. Reimbursement of the parent company for tax treatment of stock options in australia cost of the option benefits egthe spread and inclusion of such benefits in the employee's compensation should enable the subsidiary to deduct such cost from its income taxes.

Reimbursement will trigger employer tax withholding. In principle, the option benefits should be deductible from the subsidiary's income taxes based on reimbursement of the parent company for the cost of the option benefits.

However, exchange control approvals generally are required. Generally, a public company that offers stock options is required to tax treatment of stock options in australia applicable documents, translated into Chinese, to its local tax authorities in accordance with the requirements of Circular 35, which permits employees to enjoy favorable tax treatment in connection with their options.

The documents that must be submitted vary by region, but typically include: In some provinces, private companies are not subject to the document submission requirements. If the subsidiary deducts the cost of the option benefits egthe spreadwithholding and reporting are required. A tax deduction is allowed if the subsidiary reimburses the parent company for the cost of the option benefits. As a starting point, the spread is taxable upon exercise as salary income.

As of July 1,certain employee incentive schemes imply that the spread is taxable under the rules applicable to capital gains, if certain criteria are met. Consequently, the time of taxation of the employees is deferred until the time when such shares are sold by the employees.

There is no taxation at the time of grant or vesting. A local tax deduction is allowed if the subsidiary reimburses the parent company for the cost tax treatment of stock options in australia the option plan and treasury shares are issued. In the event an employee pays the exercise price from within Ecuador, tax withholding is required. A local tax tax treatment of stock options in australia may be allowed, if the subsidiary reimburses the parent company for the cost of the option benefits, provided the percentage requirements are met.

If the parent company is reimbursed by the subsidiary for the cost of the option benefits, an employee generally is taxed on the spread at exercise. If there is no reimbursement, any tax on the spread generally is deferred until the shares are sold.

An employer may be able to claim a tax deduction for the cost of option benefits, if it reimburses the parent company pursuant to a written agreement. As a minimum prerequisite, the cost has to be an actual expense entered into bookkeeping.

The acquisition gain difference between the value of the shares on the date of exercise of the option and the price of subscription or acquisition of the shares less the surplus discount already subject to tax, if any is taxable as salary in accordance with the progressive scale of income tax.

The taxation is set in the year of the exercise of option, but it is taxed in the year of the sale of the shares. The capital gain difference between the sale price and the value of the shares on the date of exercise of the option received when the shares are sold is taxable the year of the sale in accordance with the progressive scale of income tax.

The costs incurred in connection with the implementation of the stock option ie, costs of repurchase of shares, share capital increase, formalities, etc. An employer may be able to claim a tax deduction for the cost of option benefits if it reimburses the parent company and the parent company uses treasury shares.

The deduction is limited to the difference between the exercise price paid and the purchase price paid by the tax treatment of stock options in australia company to reacquire the shares. Reimbursement of the parent company for the cost of the benefit eg, tax treatment of stock options in australia spread pursuant to a written agreement should enable the subsidiary to deduct such cost from its income tax.

The spread is taxable upon exercise irrespective of whether the employment contract is still in effect or not. Tax is imposed upon further sale of the stocks. If the subsidiary takes a local tax deduction for reimbursing the parent company for the cost of the option benefits, employer withholding and reporting are required. A local tax deduction is allowed if the subsidiary reimburses the parent company for the cost of the option benefits.

The spread is taxable upon exercise. Employees shall report benefits derived from stock options in their Tax Return — Individuals BIR60 for the relevant year of assessment.

Binar optionen buch

  • Libros de comercio de opciones en linea gratis

    Options day trading strategy

  • Binary options advertising in china millionaire

    Us based binary option trading firms

Binary options association managed account top 10 binary trading brokers list binderietdk

  • Lips option trading tutorial free

    99 binary options 60 second trading strategy and also options sales and trading internship salary

  • Forex signal with trade copier

    Finding options to trade dubai

  • Best way to learn option trading

    The february scam watch option fm ubinary tradorax

Forex trading system simple 5 minute scalping

41 comments Binary options reviews from real traders 2018 comments ratings

Apakah trading forex itu halal

This paper by Partner Sarah Bernhardt discusses a number of current and emerging issues in relation to employee option plans.

We all know that 'remuneration' income is taxed at marginal rates of tax, whereas only 50 percent of 'capital gains' made by individuals are taxed at marginal rates of tax, provided the 12 month holding period rule is satisfied.

The question then is, are gains on employee options characterised as remuneration income or capital gains? Division 13A of the Income Tax Assessment Act all future statutory references will be to this Division, unless otherwise stated has the effect of treating any 'discount' on the grant of employee options as remuneration income which is taxed at marginal rates of tax.

However, Division 13A generally provides an employee with a choice of whether to pay tax on this 'discount' in the year that the options are granted up-front tax method or to defer the taxing time, generally until the year the options are exercised deferred tax method. Importantly, the calculation, timing and characterisation of an employee's tax liability can differ depending on which of these methods is used. Under the up-front tax method an employee pays the tax liability on the 'discount' on the grant of options in the year the options are granted.

The 'discount' on the grant of options is generally calculated pursuant to tables contained in the Tax Act which have regard to the deemed market value of the shares at the time the options are granted, the exercise price of the options, the maximum life of the options and any consideration paid for the grant of the options. I will talk some more about how options are valued for tax purposes later in this paper.

For present purposes, all I need you to note is that options are likely to have a deemed taxable value even if the exercise price of the options is equal to the market value of the shares at the time the options are granted. If the up-front tax method is used, no further tax would generally be payable on the options until the sale of shares acquired on exercise of the options, at which time capital gains tax would apply.

Only 50 percent of the gain would be required to be included in income provided the employee had held the shares for at least 12 months. The deferred tax method generally allows an employee to postpone any tax liability on the options until the earlier of the time when:. The amount that is subject to tax when the deferral ceases is calculated by reference to the market value of the shares at that time, rather than by reference to the market value of the shares at the time the options were granted.

This amount is taxed as remuneration income, not a capital gain, and therefore the 50 percent CGT discount does not apply. Thus, a consequence of claiming the deferral concession on options is that any increase in the value of the options until the deferral ceases is fully taxed without the 50 percent CGT discount applying.

If the employee then chooses to continue to hold the shares after the options are exercised, capital gains tax will also apply to the later disposal of those shares. However, in order to avoid double taxation, the employee is deemed to have an up-lift in their cost base of the shares to take into account that tax will have already been paid on some of the gain made on the options.

The possible differences between the up-front and deferred tax methods are best shown by way of an example calculation. It is important to note that this benefit only arises if the shares acquired on exercise of the options are held for at least 12 months after exercise. Further, as this benefit only arises if the up-front tax method is used, the benefit needs to be weighed against the cash flow costs of paying tax on the options in the year of grant. As the shares acquired on exercise of the options are not held for at least 12 months after the options are exercised, the same net gain is made regardless of which tax method is used.

This would generally mean that it would be more advantageous to use the deferred tax method as there would then not be the cash flow costs of paying tax in the year the options are granted.

As indicated in the above example, the main differences between the two tax methods are the year in which tax is payable and the characterisation of the gain as ordinary income or a capital gain. Whether an employee will be better off using the up-front tax method or the deferred tax method will depend on many factors, including:.

Unfortunately an employee is generally required to make a choice between the tax methods by the time they lodge their tax return for the year in which the options are granted, notwithstanding the fact that the majority of the above factors will not be known to an employee for some significant time after that. Generally, the only things about the choice of tax method that can be said to an employee with any certainty are as follows. My experience to date has indicated that, despite the recent introduction of the 50 percent CGT discount, most option recipients still tend to use the deferred tax method, with the possible exception of options where the taxable value is relatively low generally as a result of the exercise price being at a premium to the market value of the shares at the time of grant , or where there is a possibility of 'blue sky' in the share price eg, start ups.

This is particularly so where the exercise of the options is subject to the satisfaction of performance conditions. No doubt this is due to the fact that most Australian employees tend to take the view that they would prefer a definite tax deferral rather than a cash flow cost of paying some tax now that may or may not result in a tax advantage to them in the future. In this paper to date I have been assuming that an option recipient will generally have a choice between the two tax methods.

However, if the options are not in fact 'qualifying rights' under Division 13A, then the taxpayer will be required to use the up-front tax method. So lets now look at the pre-requisites for options to be 'qualifying rights'. First, the option must be acquired under an employee share scheme section CD 2.

The satisfaction of this condition is often a 'no brainer' as all it generally requires is that the option be acquired in respect of employment or services provided by the taxpayer or an associate of the taxpayer section C.

The main circumstances where I have seen this definition being an issue in practice are where the employee has paid market value consideration for the shares or options refer section C 3 , or where there is some question as to why an employee may have received options. I will consider this issue in more detail when I look at the possible tax implications of replacing out of the money options.

The second condition is that the company in which the taxpayer has an option to acquire a share must be the employer of the taxpayer or the holding company of the employer section CD 3. This means that up-front tax will automatically apply if, for example:. The third condition is that the options must be options to acquire ordinary shares section CD 4 , but there is no definition of what is meant by 'ordinary'.

This is rarely an issue in an Australian public company context, but can sometimes be problematic where you are dealing with options in an overseas company that does not have a similar concept to 'ordinary shares'. The last two conditions are that the employee must not hold a legal or beneficial interest in more than 5 percent of the shares in the company 5 percent holding test nor must they be in the position to cast or control the casting of more than 5 percent of the maximum number of votes that may be cast at a general meeting 5 percent voting test section CD 6 and 7.

These tests are done at the time the options or shares are acquired. In the case of shares, it is clear whether the tests will be breached. For example, if an employee already has 3 percent of the shares in the employer and acquires a further 3 percent shares, the tests will be breached. However what about the situation where an employee already has 3 percent of the shares in the employer and is offered options to acquire a further 3 percent of the shares?

It is clear that the 5 percent holding test will not be breached in this case. However, it is not as clear whether the 5 percent voting test will be breached. If there are no pre-conditions to be satisfied to exercise the rights ie the rights are 'vested' from the outset , the employee may be considered to be in a position immediately after acquiring the options to cast more than 5 percent of the votes by exercising the options, and therefore be in breach of the 5 percent voting test.

If, on the other hand, there are vesting conditions to be satisfied before the options can be exercised it seems likely that the 5 percent voting test would not be breached.

The last thing to note about the qualifying conditions is that, unlike shares, 'qualifying rights' do not have to satisfy the 75 percent offer test which requires that at least 75 percent of the permanent employees must be, or have been, entitled to acquire shares or rights in the employer at a discount. This can lead to some interesting opportunities to design plans which allow a select group of employees to acquire interests in an employer company without the need for the company to have offered its shares at a discount to its general employees.

Interestingly, Division 13A allows a continued tax deferral on such shares post vesting, provided the shares are subject to certain restrictions, notwithstanding the fact that such a deferral would not have been available if the shares were originally acquired without first acquiring a right to acquire such shares.

I mentioned earlier that the 'discount' on the grant of options is generally calculated pursuant to tables contained in the Tax Act which have regard to the deemed market value of the shares at the time the options are granted, the exercise price of the options, the maximum life of the options and any consideration paid for the grant of the options. It is these tables that tell us, for example, that an option with an exercise price equal to the market value of the share at the time the option is acquired, and a maximum 5 year life, has a deemed taxable value of I understand that these tables are based on an economic model for valuing options which attempts to value the 'inherent' benefit in options being effectively like a limited recourse interest free loan.

Some of the practical issues I have encountered with these valuation rules include the following. An employee will acquire a 'right to acquire shares' under Division 13A when another person creates that right in them section G. Generally, an offer of options would only create a right to accept an offer of a right to acquire shares, rather than creating a right to acquire shares Fraunschiel v FCT 89 ATC Thus, where you are dealing with a more traditional Australian option plan that envisages the employer making an offer of options to the employees, the employees accepting that offer, being followed by the actual grant of the options by the company, there can be an issue as to whether an employee may in fact acquire a 'right to acquire shares' at the time they accept the offer, rather than the later date that the options are actually granted.

If this was correct, and employees accepted the offer on different days, they could potentially have different taxable values of their options depending on the share price movements around the acceptance time. In practice, one possible way around this issue would be for the option plan documentation to make it clear that, notwithstanding an acceptance of an offer, an employee would have no right to acquire shares until such time as the options are actually granted.

If, instead of the more normal offer and acceptance process, employees are just told that they have been granted options which can occur with certain US based employee option plans , then this could be seen as analogous to a gift. The likely implication of this is that the employee could dissent to the gift but, if they choose not to dissent, they are arguable treated as having acquired the options at the earlier date the options were granted, notwithstanding the fact that they may not have known they have been granted the options until a later time FCT v Cornell 73 CLR at An employee may pay tax on their options without their options ever having been transferred or exercised.

This could occur, for example, where the employee has used the up-front tax method, or they have used the deferred tax method but have had a 'cessation event' under that method other than a transfer or exercise of the options eg termination of employment, where the options don't lapse on termination. In these circumstances, if the options later lapse, section DD provides for an ability to claim a refund of tax paid on the options regardless of the statutory time limits that normally govern amendments if the following conditions are satisfied.

This could occur, for example, if the options lapse as a result of non-satisfaction of performance conditions, or if the employee allows the options to lapse at the end of their term because, for example, the exercise price is greater than the market price of the shares at that time.

However, it would be unlikely to occur where, for example, the options were cancelled for consideration. The time at which this second requirement must be satisfied is unclear. There are at least 2 possibilities:. In my view, the first possibility is the better view. Otherwise, an employee who leaves their employment and loses their options later would be unable to amend their return because at the time that they 'lose' the option, the company is no longer their employer.

It is important to note that this second requirement means that the refund rules are not available to an employee whose options are granted to an associate, or to an employee who has transferred their options after grant. This is notwithstanding the fact that the employee will have been taxed on those options under Division 13A, in the first case — in the year the options were granted and, in the second case — in the year the options were transferred.

This means that, if there is a risk that the options may not be exercised, it would generally be preferable for the options to stay in the name of the employee, rather than being granted or transferred to an associate.

As I outlined at the beginning of this paper, any 'discount' on the acquisition of employee options is going to be taxed to the employee as remuneration income, without the 50 percent CGT discount applying. However, if an employee were to accept up-front tax on their options for example, because they expected that the future increase in the value of the underlying shares would be significantly greater than the deemed taxable value of the options , how could the employee ensure that they are entitled to claim the 50 percent CGT discount on the increase in the value of the shares over the deemed taxable value of the options?

I mentioned earlier that, if it is unlikely that an employee will be able to access the 50 percent CGT discount in the future, then the deferred tax method is most likely to be the preferred route. I also mentioned that, if the options are non-transferable, then the employee is only likely to be able to access the 50 percent CGT concession in the future if they are prepared to hold the shares for at least 12 months after the options are exercised.

This is because the relevant asset that is being disposed of would be the shares, not the options, and the likely acquisition date of those shares for CGT purposes would be when the options are exercised and the shares issued see Item 2 of section of the ITAA and TD16 and I understand that there may be some advisers who take the view that the shares are possibly acquired for CGT purposes at some time prior to the time when the options are exercised, but I am not sure of the technical basis for such an argument.

Maybe it has something to do with the fact that section arguably only applies where an asset is acquired other than as a result of a CGT Event, whereas shares acquired on exercise of options could be seen as being acquired a result of CGT Event C2 happening to the options. Of course, holding the shares for at least 12 months after exercise of the options would generally involve an employee being required to fund the exercise price of the shares for that 12 month period.

A possible way around this practical problem would be if the options were transferable. This is because the 50 percent CGT discount should then be able to be accessed by disposing of the options, provided the options have been held for at least 12 months. The issue then becomes whether employee option plan rules should be allowing for options to be transferred? If you were drafting new employee option plan rules then, in my view, it would be prudent to at least allow the flexibility for the options to be transferred, even if only in limited circumstances.

Apart from the possibility that this may then enable an employee who has elected for up-front tax on their options to access the 50 percent CGT discount in the future without having to hold the shares for 12 months after the exercise of the options, such a clause could also have the commercial advantages of allowing an employee to cash in on the increase in the value of their options without having to fund the exercise price, and also allow employees who want to hold the underlying shares in an associated entity's name eg, for asset protection reasons to have the shares actually issued directly to the associated entity without the need for possible brokerage costs in transferring the shares from the employee to the entity, following exercise of the options.

The following issues should be considered in the context of drafting option plan rules to provide the flexibility for the transferability of options. Generally, the deferred tax method automatically applies unless the employee elects to use the up-front tax method Tax Election.

It is important to remember however that a Tax Election would apply to both employee shares and options from any employer acquired in the same tax year — ie it is not possible to make a Tax Election that will only apply to the acquisition of one or the other. As no doubt you know, exempt share plans are often designed to take advantage of a limited tax exemption on the acquisition of shares which is only available to employees who elect for up-front tax to apply.

In my experience, it is not uncommon to see the application form for participation in such a plan to include an automatic election for up-front tax. This is presumably done on the grounds that the majority of participants in such plans are often 'blue collar' workers who may forget to make the requisite tax election unless it is included as part of the application form.

However, if the company allows all employees to participate in such a plan, notwithstanding that some of those employees may have received employee options or deferred employee shares in the same tax year as they have participated in the exempt share plan, then it will be critical for the company to adequately communicate to such employees, before they lodge their tax return for the year the shares and options are acquired, that they may want to revoke the tax election that was included in the application form for participation in the exempt share plan.

Of course this often has the follow on administrative complications of ensuring that such employees remember that they will be required to pay tax on their exempt plan shares in the year that the restrictions on disposal of those shares cease to apply generally 3 years from acquisition. It is for these reasons that employers should seriously consider whether it might be advisable to exclude option or deferred share plan participants from participating in an exempt share plan in the same tax year in which they have received options or deferred shares, especially if the exempt share plan is operated on a salary sacrifice basis, rather than just a freebie.

However, if this were to be done, care would need to be taken to ensure that the company still satisfied the 75 percent offer test that is a pre-requisite for the tax exemption being available to other recipients in the exempt share plan.